According to data from a recent study by Commtouch (Internet Threats Trend Report) published in April 2010 and referring to the first quarter of the year, every day we send about 221 billion email messages, of which 183 billion are classified as spam (85% of the total traffic globally).

United States lead the ranking of the “spamming” countries with 38 billion emails per day followed by India (13.7 billion), Russia (9.8), Vietnam (9.7) and Korea (7.6).

How much does all this junk mail cost the environment in terms of CO2 emissions?

Studies have estimated that each email message generates about 0.3 grams of CO2. Multiplying this value by the number of spam messages sent daily worldwide what we get is that every day around 54.900 tons of C02 are released into the environment: a number that translates into around 21 million tons of CO2 every year.

Just a curiosity, for the sake of comparison: the Eyjafjallajökull volcano eruption in April 2010 released into the air around 150,000 tons of CO2 every day.

42
Comments
  • Milos Sutanovac Reply

    I seriously adore the inforgraphics up here.. Who’s creating all of them? They look amazing, and I really mean it.

    I also love that this blog isn’t JUST about webdesign.. You’re on the right road, Antonio. ;)

    Keep it up,

    Miloš

    • Antonio Lupetti

      Hi Milos, thanks for your comments! We are experimenting new ways and contents for Woork Up. We don’t want to remain a niche blog.

      BTW, I designed this infographic :)

  • inerds Reply

    beautiful past, excellent piece of info-graphics! wookups new way of content displaying awesome i have to say. love it and looking forward to see more of these kind.

    regards

    • Antonio Lupetti

      Thanks a lot! :)

  • Usman Bashir Reply

    I like it, its a nice post about an issue that we don’t normally think about if ever.

    Keep-em coming :)

  • Ivan Reply

    Great job Anotonio!
    Fantastic infographic and really interesting article. Another good reason to stop spam at the source!
    Have a great day!

  • Ivan Reply

    ops… sorry for the typo on your name. i’m incredibly sorry for that!

  • Doug Reply

    Fascinating infographic, although I’m highly skeptical of the assumption that every single spam email contributes 0.3g of CO2 emissions.

    This data point came from a 2009 McAfee study. According to them, a single spam email contributed as much CO2 as driving 3 feet in a car. This strains credulity.

    Even accounting for “human processing time” deleting spam, network resources delivering the spam, and energy consumed in anti-spam activities… Does anybody really buy that the sending of 1,000 spam emails ends up polluting the same as driving a car one km?

    • Victor

      Agreed.
      Giving a reference for that 0.3g of CO2 emissions would really help.

  • José Reply

    Will u do just inforgraphics here ? mmm

    Great Design but there are more…

  • praveen vijayan Reply

    Cool post dude.. spectacular info-graphics.

  • Hameed Rahamathullah Reply

    Great Infographics. Keep up your good work!

  • Sidd Reply

    gud

  • Gustavo Reply

    Awsome post!
    i love the graphics!

  • خالد زريولي Reply

    sweet infographic, i mean it ^_^

    more spam=more CO2=bye bye life .. x_x

  • Vicheka Reply

    Nice Post! Impressive!!!

    Thanks,
    Vicheka

  • Kurund Jalmi Reply

    This is an excellent post. I love the graphics..

  • Nikunj Tamboli Reply

    This is pretty amazing to see people are not only spamming the world with emails but also increasing the co2 emissions, reallycool infographics.

  • Frédéric Hewitt Reply

    The correct information are in the text and in the graph, but the main comparison (most prominent and of same size) is between tons/day and tons/year. It’s a bit dishonest: the last thing people will remember is that spam produce more CO2 than this volcano eruption.

    Moreover, some curious users can be tempted to calculate that the eruption produce 54 750 000 tons/year of CO2. But that’s inaccurate: the eruption don’t persist during of year. Why don’t choose to make a comparison with an other source of continuous CO2 emission ?

  • David Coallier Reply

    Could you please provide a reference for the 0.3 gram per spam message?

    Regards,

  • André Reply

    The volcano reference is odd. You list 150k tons/day, but the figure for spam is in tons/year. It would be much more interesting to have another yearly figure to compare it to.

    • Antonio Lupetti

      Thanks for your suggestion André

  • Hector A,. Henry S. Reply

    Wao another one. Great job. dam Spam

  • benno Reply

    what kind of software did you use to create this nice info graphic?! I like it

    • Antonio Lupetti

      Photoshop CS2

  • jason Reply

    why would you compare tons/year to tons/day? that doesn’t seem like a math equation that people can do in their heads. you should either extrapolate 20,000,000 tons/year down into to 55,000 tons per day or 150,000 tons/day up into 54,000,000 tons/year. (I see that you mention it in the text, but I think the majority of the people look at the infographic and that’s it) If people can’t make sense out of the comparison/conversion, they’ll just ignore it.

    • Antonio Lupetti

      Thanks for your suggestion Jason.

  • Barry Harley Reply

    Sweet

  • Priyank Sharma Reply

    Great interesting trivia.

  • MajorSparrow Reply

    Great info graphic, my compliments to the designer!

  • Sarbartha Reply

    Unless we become serious..we can’t stop destruction of mankind…
    Why people Spam? I don’t know..
    When there will be no earth then meaning of SPAM will vanish totally!

  • Jennifer R Reply

    Great info, but could you tell me where do you get these figure? Is it right?

  • HBro Reply

    Not to be annoying or anything, but it’s CO2, not C02.

    Nice graph though.

    • Antonio Lupetti

      Mispelling text fixed!

    • HBro

      Thanks! :D

  • Jon Jackson Reply

    You’ve heard it before, but I’ll say it again.. nice infographics! :-)

    Great blog too, keep it up guys, and thanks for your efforts.

    • Antonio Lupetti

      Thanks a lot Jon!

  • BebopDesigner Reply

    Brilliant infographics, brilliant research, sad news though :(

    Thanks for sharing

  • Bali Reply

    Thanks for sharing…. Is really Indian people send 13.7 billion spam per day….bad :(

  • TutorialFeed Reply

    Once again excellent work by Antonio. Bravo!!!

  • Hamza Ahmed Reply

    Wow ! Amazing. Where did you get it form ? Can you email me with the email provided in the comments thing. Thanks

    YOUR WEBSITE IS AWESOME

  • @greenkiss Reply

    Grazie per il contributo, siete bravissimissimi!

Leave a Reply

RSS Feeds
Sign-up
Receive our news via e-mail
Sponsored Links

Authors

Antonio Lupetti Antonio Lupetti
Woork Up Editor in Chief
Nicola Armellini Nicola Armellini
Executive Editor