Archive for January, 2011

Il nuovo Mac App Store è l’inizio di una rivoluzione culturale?

Monday, January 10th, 2011

Due giorni fa Apple ha lanciato in contemporanea in novanta paesi il nuovo Mac App Store, una vetrina che consente agli utenti Mac di scaricare applicazioni gratuite o a pagamento sui loro computer, secondo un modello che ricalca quello dell’App Store per iPhone e iPad.

Basta un singolo click e i file sono disponibili sul Dock del desktop, pronti per essere istallati su tutti i computer Mac in proprio possesso senza bisogno di doverli scaricare di nuovo dallo Store ogni volta che si vogliono istallare sugli altri dispositivi.

Fin qui niente di nuovo in maniera eclatante. La vera novità sarà invece nel vedere come il Mac App Store cambierà le abitudini degli utenti e di quanto ne beneficerà l’industria del software. Con l’iTunes Store Apple ha rivoluzionato la fruizione dei contenuti musicali creando, laddove si credeva impossibile a causa del dilagare della pirateria sul Web, un mercato di successo di svariati milioni di dollari. Apple ha anche dimostrato che questo modello di business funziona e che gli utenti sono disposti ad acquistare contenuti multimediali nonostante essi siano in qualche modo disponibili gratuitamente tra i meandri della rete.

Questa non è solo una rivoluzione economica ma è anche, e forse prima di tutto il resto, una vera e propria rivoluzione culturale che, dopo oltre quindici anni, scardina l’idea del perché dover pagare per acquistare un file MP3 a 0,99 centesimi se quello stesso file può essere scaricato da Internet, in maniera più o meno lecita, a costo zero. Questo discorso vale per la musica ma vale anche per il software in generale.

Dagli anni del boom di Internet la pirateria ha prodotto danni economici incalcolabili con impatti devastanti in molti settori dell’economia. L’industria del software, assieme a quella musicale e cinematografica, è stata fin dalle origini una delle più colpite e penalizzate dal fenomeno.

Se il Mac App Store riscuoterà lo stesso successo degli altri App Store che l’hanno preceduto, riuscendo ad avvicinare una più larga fascia di utenti all’acquisto del software anziché scaricarlo illegalmente da Internet, ne uscirà forse, al di là del mero dato economico, una rete – intesa in senso collettivo – più matura, educata e rispettosa.

C’è da chiedersi perché, tra i concorrenti storici della Apple, chi avrebbe potuto imitare con largo anticipo il modello di successo dell’App Store non abbia colto questa grande occasione. Il motivo va forse ricercato nell’immaturità dei tempi o forse in una più banale questione di miope opportunità che nel medio periodo si è dimostrata fallimentare.

Fino a pochi anni fa l’enorme successo di Windows era dovuto anche alla facile reperibilità del software disponibile per il sistema operativo di casa Microsoft. Internet era il mercato perfetto da cui scaricare a costo zero tutti i programmi di cui un utente aveva bisogno. Paradossalmente questo meccanismo antieconomico per le aziende produttrici di software aveva indiretti risvolti positivi per Microsoft e rendeva Windows una specie di corazzata inaffondabile. Ma da oggi, forse, le cose stanno per cambiare.

Is The New Mac App Store the Beginning of a Cultural Revolution?

Sunday, January 9th, 2011

Two days ago Apple launched the new Mac App Store, a storefront that allows Mac users to download paid or free applications straight to their computers, according to a model that imitates the App Store for iPhone and iPad.

Just one click and the files are available right in your OSX Dock, ready for installation on every Mac in your possession, minus the hassle of downloading them again from the store every time you want to install them on other devices.

So far nothing new. What’s interesting is rather seeing how the Mac App Store will change the habits of users and how it will benefit the desktop software industry. With the iTunes Store, Apple has revolutionized the use and fruition of music content by creating, whereas everyone pictured it impossible because of the unstoppable piracy on the Web, a successful market of several million dollars. Apple has also demonstrated that this business model works and that users are willing to purchase multimedia content even though they are somehow available for free somewhere on the web.

This is not only an economic revolution, but also, and perhaps above all else, a real cultural revolution. In fact, after more than fifteen years it undermines the idea of questioning why one should pay to buy an MP3 file at 99 cents if that same file can be downloaded from the Internet, more often than not illegally, at no cost. This goes for the music but also applies to software in general.

Since its boom, Internet piracy has resulted in huge economic damage with devastating impact in many sectors of the economy. The software industry, along with music and film, has been one of the most affected from the very beginning and has suffered incredibly from this phenomenon. If the Mac App Store will collect the same success of the iOS App Store and it will succeed in having a higher number of users purchasing the software instead of downloading it illegally, a network – as a collective agreement – will emerge, more mature, polite and respectful, way beyond mere economic data.

One wonders why, among the Apple’s rivals, those who could imitate and anticipate the successful model of the App Store did not seize this great opportunity. The reason may be sought in the timing of the operation, not yet mature, or perhaps even more trivially in myopic strategies of Cupertino’s competitors, that in the medium have proven to be a failure.

Until a few years ago the enormous success of Microsoft Windows was also due to the easy availability of software for that operating system. Internet was the perfect “market” for downloading all the applications that a user needed at no cost. Paradoxically, this uneconomic mechanism for the software companies had indirect positive effects for Microsoft and made it a sort of unsinkable battleship.

I think now, things may change.

Twitter Birds Are Liars

Monday, January 3rd, 2011

I want to repost this interesting article wrote by Zaiga Lazdina about the use of Twitter. I think she illustrates an interesting point of view that describes perfectly the big impact of the popular micro blogging service in modern society. Please leave a comment and let me know what do you think about with.

By Zaiga LazdinaHow reliable is Twitter as a source of information, especially when other media channels are sleeping? At Twitter they are saying that they are without a doubt the best way to share and discover what is happening “right now”. Well, I must agree with the “way to share” and “right now” parts but the “discover” thing should be improved with words like “discover what is happening right now in users’ minds”.

Let’s make an example. December, 19. The elections of the Belarus president in which Alexander Lukashenko won. The things that happened after the elections in short: thousands of opposition protesters in Belarus tried to storm the government headquarters, following the country’s presidential election. A lot of people were injured, because demonstration broke out in the capital city of Minsk in support of the presidential candidates from the opposition. It happened because Alexander Lukashenko had been declared the winner, but the opposition claimed that the result was rigged. Interesting note: European Union promised to give 3 billion euros to Belarus, if the elections were held in a democratic way. More about the protest read here.

While all the media kept silent, the social network Twitter made an awesome buzz. Hundreds of new tweets every minute wrote about the situation in Minsk. All the main information channels was waiting something. One of the most popular tweets was: “CNN, BBC, Euronews WHERE ARE YOU?! Yes, Korea is tense and yes, it’s snowing, but the big story is October Sq, Minsk, Belarus.”

At that time it was the only source of information to acknowledge what was happening in October Square. From this point of view, Twitter really showed its power, while the other media channels were slow or unwilling to broadcast what was happening. One very popular tweet of that night was: “The entire value of Twitter is not in tweets like I’m Valerie, I was in a toilet, but mainly in such moments.”

At the same time the information that was retweeted the most was about the tanks all around October Square and the 4 people already killed in Minsk. These messages created mistrust in my mind, because there was no proof of it being true or not. Hundreds of people retweeted this information and spread it all over.

The following day, when news channels finally started giving information about the elections, nobody talked about tanks killing people. Why? Because it was lie. Anyone could write down whatever came to their mind and spread it, because the attention for any information about that event was enormous. Those Twitter users who didn’t understand the tweets in Russian but wanted to know what was happening, went for a translation of those tweets in English. More and more misleading information came out. Another interesting fact: while all the Twitter buzz was going on, a fake profile of the Belarus president was immediately created: “he” gave “his” opinion, which, again, was immediately retweeted.

So, how powerful is Twitter in moments like this, when people become the journalists and tell the news? The brilliant and really amazing thing is that you can get these news immediately and from the very people involved in the event. From the opposite point of view though, they have the opportunity to manipulate and spread fake information. I’m not saying that the news channels don’t do it, but I think it’s more about hiding the information or telling half-truths. On Twitter, lies can be much more brutal.

© 2010 – Original post by Zaiga Lazdina

Delicious è un morto che cammina

Sunday, January 2nd, 2011

Secondo alcune recenti indiscrezioni sembra che Yahoo abbia intenzione, nei prossimi mesi, di chiudere (o forse vendere) Delicious, lo storico servizio di bookmark sharing acquistato dal colosso del web fondato da Jerry Yang e David Filo nel 2005.

Se la notizia della sua chiusura fosse vera, Delicious si appresterebbe a chiudere la sua carriera in maniera abbastanza deludente dopo otto anni di gloriosa attività (il sito è stato fondato nel 2003 da Joshua Schachter). Ormai l’impressione diffusa è quella di avere a che fare con un servizio che versa in uno stato di quasi totale abbandono. Già da diverso tempo la gestione del sito, che vanta qualcosa come 66 milioni di pageviews mensili, lascia molto a desiderare specialmente per quanto riguarda il monitoraggio dei bookmark aggiunti dagli utenti.

La pagina dedicata ai link popolari (delicious.com/popular), una delle più visitate del famoso portale di link sharing, è continuamente invasa da spam e pare che nessuno nel quartier generale di Sunnyvale in California sembra farci più caso. Insomma Delicious è un morto che cammina in attesa che qualcuno si decida a mettere fine alla sua penosa agonia. Speriamo solo che, nelle condizioni in cui versa il sito, Yahoo! almeno il buongusto di staccare la spina in fretta.

Delicious Is a Dead Man Walking

Sunday, January 2nd, 2011

According to recent rumors it seems that Yahoo! is going to close (or sell) Delicious, the popular social bookmarking web service acquired by the web giant founded by Jerry Yang and David Filo in 2005.

If the news of its closure was true, Delicious would terminate its career in a fairly disappointing way after eight years of glorious activity (the site was founded by Josua Schachter in 2003). It’s a common perception of having to do with a service that is in a state of almost total neglect now. The site’s management is not all that it should be since a long time, especially as for the monitoring of bookmarks added by users.

The page dedicated to popular bookmarks (delicious/popular), which is one of the most visited pages on the famous social bookmarking service that counts something like 66 million monthly pageviews, is continuously flooded with spam and in the headquarters in Sunnyvale, California, no one seems to notice it.

So, Delicious is a dead man walking waiting for someone to put an end to his agony. I only hope that, under the conditions prevailing in the site, Yahoo! has the decency to to pull the plug soon.